Basically, the worst and the best companies using different models within the parametric methods are the same.
The project has been carried out as part of the HSE Program of Fundamental Studies.
In part this is related to the heterogeneity of different size companies, and probably with some external factors (functioning specialties).Goldcorp are.5 and.2 respectively.A 15 percent allocation to gold equities and an 85 percent allocation.S.Stocks, adding a small percentage of gold-related assets to a diversified portfolio slightly reduced overall risk.Analysis of the dynamics indicates a slowdown in the increase of the efficiency of the leaders and bridge the gap between the pursuers companies idgc of Siberia, idgc of Volga, idgc Tumenenergo.Thus, on average, there is potential to reduce these costs about.That is 37 percent greater than the 4,800 for the portfolio solely invested in the S P 500, while adding virtually zero risk.Empirical base of research: data of the Federal State Statistics Service, the Russian Archive of economic and sociological data, pogotowie dentystyczne monte cassino białystok reports and information of the Russian and foreign companies, official information of the executive authorities of the Russian Federation, analytical and statistical materials of international organizations.Leading companies are still th same as those in our study in 2013 - idgc of South, idgc of North-West.Assuming the same average annual returns since 1971 and annual rebalancing over 40 years, a hypothetical 100 investment in a portfolio with 15 percent gold stocks would be worth about 6,600.The regulator should have a good understanding of the risks of regulation, which may increase the costs of market participants and distort the response from the regulated firms, and be able to avoid them.The monitoring results allow us to make a conclusion that the attempt to use only one method of control for benchmarking profoundly mistaken.In the development mass effect 3 bonus skills of the methodology: methodological approaches have been improved to conduct regular monitoring of the technical efficiency of natural monopolies (benchmarking).
Modeling results indicate that cols and DEA give approximately the same performance assessment companies.
The results obtained using a model specifically designed for the sample on the basis of cols, proved to be more favorable for the analyzed companies - their average efficiency increased by using a special model.